Saturday, 23 January 2010

Ejiet: A great scholar and teacher

“Without doubt, the Literature fraternity is going to miss his scholarship, consistent creativity and genuine humanity,” – Prof. Bukenya
He was a great teacher and a great scholar,” is what Prof. Austin Bukenya remembers of the late Prof. Austin Ejiet (RIP), an eminent columnist, humourist and satirist. The columnist-cum-scholar passed away at Nsambya Hospital on Saturday. According to a family source, Ejiet had been in and out of hospital for a long time, before he finally succumbed on Saturday January 2.
Aged 58, the author, professor of creative writing and commentator, died of liver and pancreas cancer at Nsambya hospital two weeks after his admission.
He was retained as a teaching assistant at the Literature Department, Makerere University where he had graduated in 1978, with a first class degree in Literature. He later obtained a PhD from the University of Iowa in the US.
Much of his writing, including his anthology of short stories, Aida, Hurray for Somo and Other Stories, focus on different aspects of life and its absurdities. He employs satire to unveil the injustices in everyday life. “You can write about the most sacrilegious thing and get away with it,” once said Prof. Ejiet.
While he was the head of the Literature Department at Makerere University, he designed a creative writing course in 1991 which he taught with late Prof. Francis Kidhubuka, though it never survived for long. This, notwithstanding its short lifespan pointed to his passion for the growth of creative writing in Uganda, which he lamented, was lacklustre and wanting.
Prof. Bukenya opined that apart from dissecting some of the most serious and risky political issues with fine humour and satire, Prof. Ejiet was also a very intelligent industrious scholar, who inspired many of his students both in literary terms and in real life.
Bukenya also credits Ejiet for having kept the department going as its head of department during the difficult period of the early ‘90s. “It was a difficult time in terms of finances and resources, but he kept the department going,” said Bukenya, himself an old hand, a senior lecturer at the department, an author and scholar.
While spewing his admiration for African authors, Chinua Achebe, Wole Soyinka, Okot p’Bitek and Ngugi wa Thiongo, for helping Africa understand itself, and rehabilitating the continent’s image, he so much lamented about the dimming spirit of creative writing in Uganda. He once told this writer that there has been concerted and painful progress in African writing, but with much of such writing aping Achebe’s, Soyinka’s and Ngugi’s classics. Whereas this could actually spell doom to local creative writing, he was categorical that Uganda has a poor history of rewarding creative writers. Musicians get better rewards and most of them continue singing and living off their music. This is just besides the fact that many people are too busy figuring out ways of surviving rather than sitting down to write say, a poem. He cited his own example when he had a 25-year teaching stint at Makerere University. He would start work at 8 pm and end at 5 pm, a schedule, which was too exhaustive to allow him to create room for creative writing. The 25 years were kind of wasted in terms of his creative output.
But, for the creative writers, they “should come up with new and appealing genres to set a unique system of creative works. Most of the earlier African writing dwelt intensively on colonialism. This has been overtaken by events.
“Creative writing is different from writing a historical piece. In creative writing, especially on current issues, one should endeavour to keep in touch with current events. A short story would do better here,” he told this writer in a past interview. Whereas it takes a leisurely pace, say, a day or a week to write a short story, it takes even years to write a novel.
He cited Nuruddin Farah, whose writing dwelt on former president of Somalia, Said Barre and his tyrannical rule. “Despite being a very bright fellow, he has nothing to say because Barre is no more.” The events during Barre’s tyrannical regime were overtaken by history.
Sr. Dr. Dominic Dipio, the current head of the Department of Literature at Makerere University, fondly echoes Prof. Bukenya’s memories of Austin Ejiet. “He was a great scholar, literary critic, satirist and humorist,” she said, beside his social, reticent and self-controlled nature. Alluding to his unique sense of humour, she says whenever he was teaching, he was always making a lot of fun, and this made his lectures so lively. She also alludes fondly to his intelligence, citing that he mentored most of the current crop of figures practicing literature at Makerere University’s Literature department.
She elucidates the fact that “he made us feel very special at the time, and taught us invaluable skills like expressing oneself in a few words” and in the use of good grammar and choice of words.
Whether there could be another Ejiet in the making, “There’s something of him in all of us in creative, satirical, humorous ways,” Sr. Dr. Dipio remarked.
“Without doubt, the Literature fraternity is going to miss his scholarship, consistent creativity and genuine humanity,” summed up Prof. Bukenya.
While head of the Literature Department, Ejiet helped establish the Mass Communication Department at the same university, which department is one of the premier journalism training centres in East Africa.
Ejiet’s life was marred by tragedy, the worst being the death of his wife when he was still teaching at Makerere University. But, according to him, reading was a way to escape such misery and make him sober.
He is best remembered for his anthology of short stories, Aida Hurray for Somo and Other stories, and his weekly satirical column, “Take It or Leave It” in the Sunday Monitor. However, he also wrote three children’s books in Ateso, his mother tongue, besides editing literary works.
His acquaintances, readers, and those he mentored will fondly remember him as a dedicated scholar, humorous and satirical personality, who delivered such attributes through his writings and in the daily life encounters. With his column “Take It or Leave It”, he was one of the longest and consistent columnists in the Sunday Monitor. He also wrote ‘Reality Check’, a weekly column for at least three years, in the Sunrise weekly newspaper. At the time of his death, he was the Dean of the Faculty of Humanities at the Kampala International University. He was instrumental in founding the Faculty of Education at the Kampala International University, Western campus in Ishaka. He also previously taught at Uganda Martyrs University, Nkozi.
Ejiet was born in 1951 in Kumi. He was laid to rest on Monday January 4, in Atutur village, his ancestral home in Kumi district, eastern Uganda.

Wednesday, 16 December 2009

Mwenda among Top 100 Global Thinkers

By Joshua Masinde
The Independent Managing Editor, Andrew Mwenda, was listed by the Foreign Policy (FP) magazine amongst the Top 100 Global Thinkers, together with greats like US President Barack Obama, former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, Pope Benedict XI (ranked17th), billionaire Bill Gates (ranked 12th) and a host of other leaders, Nobel laureates, journalists, economists and academicians.
At rank 98, Mwenda was recognised for his vociferous criticism of all elements of the African aid structure and like the other top hundred global thinkers, for contributing to the big ideas that shaped the world in 2009.
According to FP, Mwenda, a dogged and fiercely eloquent Ugandan journalist and editor of The Independent is a vociferous critic of all elements of the African aid structure. “Frequently harassed by the Ugandan government for his outspokenness and currently facing trial on 21 charges (including sedition), Mwenda goes even further than most aid critics: The continent, he argues, needs to fail in order to learn hard lessons as it picks up the pieces on its own. He responded with fire to Obama’s July speech in Ghana, writing, ‘Obama needs to listen to Africans much more, not lecture them using the same old teleprompter.’”
At home, Mwenda has serially castigated President Yoweri Museveni’s regime on corruption, sectarianism, human rights abuses, and for vesting the country’s leadership and resources in family rule. He has also been fighting for free speech and economic empowerment throughout Africa. His belief is anchored in the idea that western aid has been largely unhelpful to African development as it fans corrupt states and sustains wars.
US President, Barack Obama, was ranked second for re-imagining America’s role in the world. Other Africans listed amongst the top hundred include Dr. Kofi Annan, former UN Secretary-General. He was ranked 30th for his ceaseless work to create Africa’s Green Revolution. “Africa is the only region where overall food security and livelihoods are deteriorating,” he declared in 2007, vowing to create “an environmentally sustainable, uniquely African Green Revolution,” according to the FP.
Another African, George Ayittey, was ranked 76th for pushing policymakers to let Africa help itself. Sayyid Imam al-Sharif from Egypt was ranked 10th for striking a mortal ideological blow to al Qaeda. Ayaan Hirsi Ali from Somalia was ranked 48 for her provocative critique of Islam, the religion of her youth.
Ben Bernanke, the chairman of Federal Reserve in Washington, was ranked in first position for his role in staving off a new Great Depression. He topped the list for “turning his superb academic career into a blueprint for action, for single-handedly reinventing the role of a central bank, for preventing the collapse of the US economy. Having done all of these within the span of a few months is certainly one of the greatest intellectual feats of recent years.
Women bagged seventeen slots of the top hundred. They are: Zahra Rahnavard from Iran, ranked 3rd for being the brains behind Iran’s Green Revolution and the campaign of her husband, opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi; Aung San Suu Kyi, from Burma ranked 26th for being a living symbol of hope in a dark place; Elinor Ostrom from US, ranked 28 for showing us that the global commons isn’t such a tragic place after all; Esther Duflo from US ranked 41 for adding quantitative rigor to assessments of foreign aid; Ayaan Hirsi Ali from Somalia, ranked 48 for her provocative critique of Islam, the religion of her youth; Helene Gayle from US ranked 52 for putting HIV/AIDS in its big-picture context; Barbara Ehrenreich ranked 59 for her relentless efforts to understand the root causes of poverty and inequality; Esther Dyson from US, ranked 70th for accurately forecasting how the Internet will shape us; Anne-Marie Slaughter ranked 79th for helping transform Foggy Bottom from the inside out; Samantha Power from US ranked 80th for moving from moral authority to government authority on human rights; Hu Shuli a journalist from China ranked 84th for persisting in the idea that public accountability is possible even in one-party China; Jacqueline Novogratz from US ranked at 85th position for helping build a new generation of social entrepreneurs; Karen Armstrong from Britain ranked 87th for advocating a truce in the religion wars; Sunita Narain from India ranked 88 for giving voice to India’s environmental conscience; Martha Nussbaum ranked 93rd for making philosophy matter; Valerie Hudson from US ranked 97th for showing that gender imbalances have global consequences and Emily Oster from US ranked 99th for her creative research into what really helps the poor.
Some former and current prominent leaders also rated amongst the top 100 Global Thinkers include: Bill Clinton, the former US president, ranked 6th for redefining philanthropy in the modern era; Vaclav Havel, former president of the Czech Republic, rated 23rd for four decades of speaking truth to power; Fernando Henrique Cardoso, former Brazilian President ranked 11th for calling the war on drugs what it is: a disaster and former US Vice President Dick Cheney ranked 13th for his full-throated defence of American power.
Some Nobel laureates rated amongst the hundred include: Muhammad Yunus, a Bangladesh economist ranked 46th for proving that the poor are profitable, John Holdren and Steven Chu, ranked 34th for putting cutting-edge science back into power, Rajendra Pachauri from India ranked 5th for ending the debate over whether climate change matters, Joseph Stiglitz, from US ranked 25th for relentlessly questioning economic dogma, Paul Krugman, from US ranked 29th for proving that a Nobel Prize winner can also be a prolific pundit and unerringly correct doomsayer, Amartya Sen, a US economist ranked 58th for showing how democracy prevents famine.

Friday, 11 December 2009

FGM law offers respite to female posterity

By Joshua Masinde
Way back in 1999, during the December holidays after I had just completed my primary leaving examination, I had the privilege of attending an initiation rite of the Sabaot of Mt. Elgon region in Western Kenya. My uncle, with whose family I was staying, took me there. It was late in the night. The ghostly darkness, dancing odiously in the chilling breeze gave the night the smell of blood, incivility and abhorrence.
I had undergone my own rite of passage a year before. Practically, though not a fan of circumcision rituals, this one I was taken to attend was quite out of the ordinary.
Having expected to see brave young men, enduring the chilly night, dancing, drumming and jingling their instruments so used in circumcision rites, a surprise lay in waiting. Drama, dancing, and hullaballoo enshrined the occasion with vigour. The unexpected sight of a file of young, energetic and frail ladies, dancing vigorously, first in circles, then in one straight file away from the crowd, was to me a spectacular scene of witches dancing away their evil machinations past midnight, downloaded straight from a Nollywood script.
But, the most private details of the genitalia cut, was for us not to behold. But, my mind conceived all possible graphic details of the act itself, as I kept wondering that alas, and indeed, my unfortunate sisters had at last, mutated into adulthood, through a very excruciating exercise that was to change their lives FOR-EVER. The cut itself, blood trickling....
The lurid gory details clearly defined the blast from the past, with a sense of pity and remorse for the victims.
But, a recent parliamentary report on Female Genital Mutilation in Kapchorwa and Nakapiripit districts in eastern Uganda signalled a timely intervention, which could offer respite to the girls and women who would have undergone the crude cultural rite. This report led to the passing by the Ugandan legislature, on December 10, of a new law outlawing and criminalising FGM. The law grants a maximum 10 year-punishment for the perpetrators of the crude act, and life imprisonment for those who carry out aggravated FGM. This is a new lease of life in the female posterity who could have been subjected to the cut, much like their predecessors. Aggravated FGM is a case where the victim passes on after the cut, or is infected with HIV/AIDS or becomes disabled.
Prior to enacting the law, Dr. Chris Baryomunsi, Kinkizi east MP in Uganda moved a motion in Parliament on April 29, to prohibit female genital mutilation (FGM). Dr. Baryomunsi later introduced a private bill countering FGM in Uganda parliament in September for debate and was unanimously enacted into law on December 10.
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines female genital mutilation (FGM) as "the partial or total removal of the external female genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs whether for cultural or other non-therapeutic reasons.
FGM is practiced the world over, and Amnesty International estimates over 130 million women worldwide have been victimised. It is estimated that 92 million of Africa’s women have been victims with over 3 million cases carried out annually on the African continent. In Uganda, the Sabiny of Kapchorwa, Bukwo, Bugiri and Nakapiripirit districts in the eastern frontier have indigenous tribes that highly practice FGM, according to the parliamentary report. The rite is performed bi-annually each year.
There are about four ways in which FGM is executed: “Sunna" circumcision is the removal of the prepuce and/or the tip of the clitoris; Clitoridectomy, or excision, which is the removal of the entire clitoris and adjacent labia; Infibulation (pharaonic circumcision), removal of the clitoris and entire labia and then joining the scraped sides of the vulva across the vagina using thorns or catgut, leaving only a small opening for passage of urine and menstrual blood.
FGM is generally performed in unsanitary conditions with unclean sharp instruments, such as pieces of glass, stones, knives, or razor blades. A single instrument is often used on many girls and/or women without cleaning, leading to the transmission of various viruses, such as HIV/AIDS.
While there are no benefits associated with FGM, the procedure is characterised with health complications like cruelty of the procedure, urine retention which is painful, short term haemorrhage, which can lead to death. It can also engender infertility, vulva abscess, clitoral cysts, labia adherences, difficulties in menstruation, fistula, disability and increased risks of HIV/AIDS infections.
In the parliamentary report, Mr Peter Kamuron, a human rights activist, opines that; “Once a girl is cut, she is cut off from enjoying her reproductive health and rights and continuing with education, and from any hope for employment and or future economic survival.”
But, an initiative like the Reproductive Educative and Community Health (REACH) began in 1996 in Kapchorwa, which has been on the forefront in helping to mitigate FGM. Using education as its primary tool in eliminating FGM, REACH formed the Sabiny Elders Association to reach the people. Ultimately, the communities made their own the decisions to stop. The Kapchorwa district saw a tremendous 36 per cent decrease in FGM between 1994 and 1996.

Bestsellers