What do women really want? Do they want everything that the men have? Perhaps, it is true they admire and wish to have much of what the hoarse-voiced species have, save the elongated glands in between their counterparts’ legs. But, some would boldly wish to share in this prerogative. 
The affirmative action is a typical example of women’s protracted urge to want to have what we men have. Let’s talk from a realistic point of view. The affirmative action was a little known animal until the time the women realised they could as well eat chicken like the male folks. It took them to Beijing just in pursuit of some of the copies of prerogative that men have.
There came the kimansulo. This was perhaps propelled by immoralistic instincts. It was a ‘negative’ step towards women deliverance movement. I don’t know nor care whether or not kimansulo still does exist.
Then there was one of the most daring moves towards feminine liberation. The outset of the vagina monologue comes to mind. What do we call this? Should the young ones grow up while knowing that vagina monologue is or was the sweet and honey with which to woo emancipation out of the woods? Then, where does our fate lie? As your reminder, the V collapsed empires. It buried and continues to bury careers at the wake of each day. Though, it could be the one of the most powerful tools that could be used to pave way for the success of the affirmative action, it seems to have been grounded already. I no longer hear rumours about the V monologue.
From a conservative’s point of view, most of such prospects are unrealistic. The affirmative action cannot be fully realised by staging such weird revolutions amongst our womenfolk every other day, be it in the August House, through activism etc. The revolution must come from the angle of love. The love revolution is a better option. And perhaps, as the women know, it is easily attainable through the man’s stomach (not the only avenue). Feed him well and he’ll give you the little space you’ve always yearned for. Love him like a child and he will lose his mind.
It might be hard for the conservative to give away such little freedom they have in the guise of affirmative action. But, it can be done in a strategic and gradual process by imparting the reason for liberty in their psyche.
From a liberalist point of view, for which I am, it is easy. Let’s make bows, arrows, spears, and machete for the women and sent them to the forest to hunt. Let them continue fighting for their rights. That is the initial step towards attaining the concepts of affirmative action. Isn’t that right? Let them have their pick from within the woods of freedom. That is where the struggle begins.
From the same point of view, I am yet to see a woman, real African lady, come to me boldly and emit the sweet and lovely venom: “I have a crush on you. I want to be your woman.” Or it could be more lethal or healthier when the assertion becomes bolder: “I want to marry you.” Perhaps, wait shall I. I hope I won’t be in bad mood. I pray the assertion won’t be in bad faith.
Since most men wish to be treated like kids, then who should do it? It is the pro-affirmative action activists. Let them treat their bearded partners like kids and they shall indeed gain access to the prerogatives they have envisaged for times historical. They will walk like their counterparts and there will be no problem with that.
On a ‘serious’ note now, for those on whose heads many cows have been paid, they should be courageous enough to return them. What a bold move to our women’s liberation movement that will be? We shall throw all care to the wind and play the same fiddle with them. The men folk will continue allowing them in drinking joints. They will let them sip the mental poison together as the children and the homes take care of themselves.
However, this will not really work. They can’t really have their cake and eat it at the same time. From time immemorial, our societies have borne patriarchal colours. But, it seems at the end of the day, women would wish to see to it that the society becomes matriarchal.
They have followed their men to the gym and are seriously earning strong muscles. When they come back home, they train blows on their men as if those are the best punching bags they could ever have.
Do we men really think we are strong? We lost the battle. Those who rule us are our women, not we men. Past media reports revealed that China’s Chongqing’s city plans to build a town dedicated to women at its Shuangqiao District. While in "Women's Town," men will have to obey their wives or girlfriends' orders, satisfy their every demand. If not, they should anticipate punishment without mercy.
The slogan "women are never wrong; men can never refuse their needs" will be put at the gate, to greet men as they enter. Any man who tries to argue and oppose this rule will be punished by kneeling on a hard board or washing plates for local restaurants.
According to the plan, justices and a court will be set up in the town to "lash" male tourists who do something to make women unhappy. For instance, if men can't quickly satisfy their partner's desire for a particular food or cosmetic, they may be sentenced to be lashed by the justice. The lash, however, is specially-made and described as "soft" enough not to hurt them. We men are already at their mercy.
That is not enough. Our women need to realise that they are already dominant. The first is that the masculine species desire them a lot. They bear insatiable thirst for these feminine species. So, if they run away, the bearded creatures become a miserable lot.
The women are the ‘dominant sex.’ They can endure long without men. There are cases of single mothers who have no problem with remaining the way they are. On the contrary, a bloke whose better half passes away will marry forthwith.
In another situation, if a bloke and a woman are subjected to similar hostile conditions like starvation, no water, no shelter and tough climatic conditions, the bloke will succumb to the harsh conditions first as opposed to the woman. Thanks to nature, the woman will still be alive and kicking to bury the bloke. Who’s stronger now?
The strength of a woman…. Shaggy sang the same... is the strength that most men overlook. Such strength is eminent in the likes of Wolfwitz saga, Clinton-Lewinsky saga, the Biblical Samson and Delilah etc.
Soon, the women folk have strapped themselves in the jalopy to seek for the political cake. They are ever asking for special seats in the August House. Let them go to the people and seek their mandate. Since they are ‘stronger’ than us, no silver platter goodies are available at the moment. Not anymore.
Joshua Masinde
The affirmative action is a typical example of women’s protracted urge to want to have what we men have. Let’s talk from a realistic point of view. The affirmative action was a little known animal until the time the women realised they could as well eat chicken like the male folks. It took them to Beijing just in pursuit of some of the copies of prerogative that men have.
There came the kimansulo. This was perhaps propelled by immoralistic instincts. It was a ‘negative’ step towards women deliverance movement. I don’t know nor care whether or not kimansulo still does exist.
Then there was one of the most daring moves towards feminine liberation. The outset of the vagina monologue comes to mind. What do we call this? Should the young ones grow up while knowing that vagina monologue is or was the sweet and honey with which to woo emancipation out of the woods? Then, where does our fate lie? As your reminder, the V collapsed empires. It buried and continues to bury careers at the wake of each day. Though, it could be the one of the most powerful tools that could be used to pave way for the success of the affirmative action, it seems to have been grounded already. I no longer hear rumours about the V monologue.
From a conservative’s point of view, most of such prospects are unrealistic. The affirmative action cannot be fully realised by staging such weird revolutions amongst our womenfolk every other day, be it in the August House, through activism etc. The revolution must come from the angle of love. The love revolution is a better option. And perhaps, as the women know, it is easily attainable through the man’s stomach (not the only avenue). Feed him well and he’ll give you the little space you’ve always yearned for. Love him like a child and he will lose his mind.
It might be hard for the conservative to give away such little freedom they have in the guise of affirmative action. But, it can be done in a strategic and gradual process by imparting the reason for liberty in their psyche.
From a liberalist point of view, for which I am, it is easy. Let’s make bows, arrows, spears, and machete for the women and sent them to the forest to hunt. Let them continue fighting for their rights. That is the initial step towards attaining the concepts of affirmative action. Isn’t that right? Let them have their pick from within the woods of freedom. That is where the struggle begins.
From the same point of view, I am yet to see a woman, real African lady, come to me boldly and emit the sweet and lovely venom: “I have a crush on you. I want to be your woman.” Or it could be more lethal or healthier when the assertion becomes bolder: “I want to marry you.” Perhaps, wait shall I. I hope I won’t be in bad mood. I pray the assertion won’t be in bad faith.
Since most men wish to be treated like kids, then who should do it? It is the pro-affirmative action activists. Let them treat their bearded partners like kids and they shall indeed gain access to the prerogatives they have envisaged for times historical. They will walk like their counterparts and there will be no problem with that.
On a ‘serious’ note now, for those on whose heads many cows have been paid, they should be courageous enough to return them. What a bold move to our women’s liberation movement that will be? We shall throw all care to the wind and play the same fiddle with them. The men folk will continue allowing them in drinking joints. They will let them sip the mental poison together as the children and the homes take care of themselves.
However, this will not really work. They can’t really have their cake and eat it at the same time. From time immemorial, our societies have borne patriarchal colours. But, it seems at the end of the day, women would wish to see to it that the society becomes matriarchal.
They have followed their men to the gym and are seriously earning strong muscles. When they come back home, they train blows on their men as if those are the best punching bags they could ever have.
Do we men really think we are strong? We lost the battle. Those who rule us are our women, not we men. Past media reports revealed that China’s Chongqing’s city plans to build a town dedicated to women at its Shuangqiao District. While in "Women's Town," men will have to obey their wives or girlfriends' orders, satisfy their every demand. If not, they should anticipate punishment without mercy.
The slogan "women are never wrong; men can never refuse their needs" will be put at the gate, to greet men as they enter. Any man who tries to argue and oppose this rule will be punished by kneeling on a hard board or washing plates for local restaurants.
According to the plan, justices and a court will be set up in the town to "lash" male tourists who do something to make women unhappy. For instance, if men can't quickly satisfy their partner's desire for a particular food or cosmetic, they may be sentenced to be lashed by the justice. The lash, however, is specially-made and described as "soft" enough not to hurt them. We men are already at their mercy.
That is not enough. Our women need to realise that they are already dominant. The first is that the masculine species desire them a lot. They bear insatiable thirst for these feminine species. So, if they run away, the bearded creatures become a miserable lot.
The women are the ‘dominant sex.’ They can endure long without men. There are cases of single mothers who have no problem with remaining the way they are. On the contrary, a bloke whose better half passes away will marry forthwith.
In another situation, if a bloke and a woman are subjected to similar hostile conditions like starvation, no water, no shelter and tough climatic conditions, the bloke will succumb to the harsh conditions first as opposed to the woman. Thanks to nature, the woman will still be alive and kicking to bury the bloke. Who’s stronger now?
The strength of a woman…. Shaggy sang the same... is the strength that most men overlook. Such strength is eminent in the likes of Wolfwitz saga, Clinton-Lewinsky saga, the Biblical Samson and Delilah etc.
Soon, the women folk have strapped themselves in the jalopy to seek for the political cake. They are ever asking for special seats in the August House. Let them go to the people and seek their mandate. Since they are ‘stronger’ than us, no silver platter goodies are available at the moment. Not anymore.
Joshua Masinde
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment